Mazdaspeed Forums

Mazdaspeed Forums (http://www.mazdaspeedforums.org/forum/)
-   MazdaSpeed 3 - Engine, Transmission & Driveline (http://www.mazdaspeedforums.org/forum/f10/)
-   -   Chicken Wire Screen? (http://www.mazdaspeedforums.org/forum/f10/chicken-wire-screen-69645/)

hnda etr 01-14-2011 11:01 AM

Chicken Wire Screen?
 
3 Attachment(s)
Someone brought up the issue about the "Chicken wire mesh" on another forum, and I thought I would point out a few things...

Do these OEM parts look like they're bullshit too?

Pic 1: 2002-2004 Nissan Maxima
Pic 2: 2000-2002 Infinity i30 (basically another Maxima)
Pic 3: 1998-2002 Volvo C70 (among others)

Discuss...

gtlaw 01-14-2011 12:42 PM

its used as an air straightener z32 300zx used it too. if your talking about adding it to our maf housing like PTP did its probably not beneficial

labikesrcool 01-14-2011 01:06 PM

oh wow. do some searchin there are posts longer than the big rolls of toilet paper on this...and that's about all they are good for too. PTP was a huge proponent of this. afaik still is.

801MS3 01-14-2011 01:32 PM

PeeTeePee claimed the material they used was from GM and used in their MAF housings..

either way... if its legit from GM or chicken wire from home depot it won't produce the benefits they claimed..

In the end John is still a douche.. the people who bougth this most likely got duped. And this stuff still hasn't been proved to make any difference on our platform.

wankular 01-14-2011 01:39 PM

Chicken wire only looks good in bumpers.

hnda etr 01-14-2011 01:56 PM

My intent wasn't to start a for/against PTP thread...

I just wanted to bring up a discussion about why OEM manufacturers use this type of airflow straightening mesh, and why the use of a similar mesh material would NOT be effective on our platforms.

After all, I'm sure the OEMs spent a shit-ton of money developing their intake systems, so why would they use a mesh straightener if it has no effect? It can't be to catch any stray material that slips past the air cleaner... so why would they use this?

It's been so long, I don't remember, but does anyone else know what our stock air intake looked like? did it have any type of airflow straightener in it?

the_caruch 01-14-2011 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hnda etr (Post 688854)
My intent wasn't to start a for/against PTP thread...

I just wanted to bring up a discussion about why OEM manufacturers use this type of airflow straightening mesh, and why the use of a similar mesh material would NOT be effective on our platforms.

After all, I'm sure the OEMs spent a shit-ton of money developing their intake systems, so why would they use a mesh straightener if it has no effect? It can't be to catch any stray material that slips past the air cleaner... so why would they use this?

It's been so long, I don't remember, but does anyone else know what our stock air intake looked like? did it have any type of airflow straightener in it?


I had the honeycomb mesh looking stuff OEM on my 2000 Pontiac GrandPrix GT. Some guys would take it out but then report a crappy idle. Also that it would "hunt" for the desired idle rpm. Basically the air was tumbling all around and wasn't metered right.

It definitely has an effect. I prefer mazda's way compared to the honeycomb. There looks to be less material to impede airflow while still getting the job done.

Yes the stock box does have a straightener in it. I believe it was molded into the plastic or something.



mazda

http://www.streetunit.com/v/vspfiles.../9-21070-2.jpg
http://www.suremotorsports.com/img/p...raightener.jpg


pontiac (GM)

http://www.gaownersclub.com/gallery/.../maf/maf10.jpg

SSinstaller 01-14-2011 02:34 PM

Only one of those pictures shows a mesh before the MAF, two show plastic airflow straighteners.

I'd bet that the mesh is to achieve a more stable MAF output in very low flow situations... Not to correct for airflow issues due to improper MAF housings--which was the way PTP marketed their "product".

the_caruch 01-14-2011 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SSinstaller (Post 688896)
Only one of those pictures shows a mesh before the MAF, two show plastic airflow straighteners.

I'd bet that the mesh is to achieve a more stable MAF output in very low flow situations... Not to correct for airflow issues due to improper MAF housings--which was the way PTP marketed their "product".

That makes sense. Hence why some of the Pontiac guys said it made their idle shitty when they took it out.

triplejumper18 01-14-2011 02:42 PM

Why do you need this?

1. Smooths the turbulent air that feeds the MAF on the Speed cars.
2. Adds a noticeable gain in idle quality.
3. There is a felt gain in WHP.
4. Its affordable and seems to help with the MPG that you car
uses, should pay for itself over time.
5. Its a mod that anyone could do, so have fun.

http://www.pt-performance.com/images...38f6794ab8.jpg

*cough* *cough*

TRex 01-14-2011 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hnda etr (Post 688854)
My intent wasn't to start a for/against PTP thread...

I just wanted to bring up a discussion about why OEM manufacturers use this type of airflow straightening mesh, and why the use of a similar mesh material would NOT be effective on our platforms.

After all, I'm sure the OEMs spent a shit-ton of money developing their intake systems, so why would they use a mesh straightener if it has no effect? It can't be to catch any stray material that slips past the air cleaner... so why would they use this?

It's been so long, I don't remember, but does anyone else know what our stock air intake looked like? did it have any type of airflow straightener in it?

you hit the nail on the head....oem manufacturers spend a lot of time developing their intake....so why then would you want to put it on their if it doesnt come with it stock? use the design mazda intended..im sure most modern designs have strayed away from the mesh

hnda etr 01-14-2011 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triplejumper18 (Post 688914)
Why do you need this?

1. Smooths the turbulent air that feeds the MAF on the Speed cars.
2. Adds a noticeable gain in idle quality.
3. There is a felt gain in WHP.
4. Its affordable and seems to help with the MPG that you car
uses, should pay for itself over time.
5. Its a mod that anyone could do, so have fun.

http://www.pt-performance.com/images...38f6794ab8.jpg

*cough* *cough*

I'm guessing that it would have helped the original mazdaspeed CAI that didn't have a straightener... lol
Quote:

Originally Posted by TRex (Post 688917)
you hit the nail on the head....oem manufacturers spend a lot of time developing their intake....so why then would you want to put it on their if it doesnt come with it stock? use the design mazda intended..im sure most modern designs have strayed away from the mesh

I'll have to find my stock intake and see what Mazda used... I don't remember there being an air straightener in there, but maybe there is lol...

Edit: There are lots of things that Mazda (and other manufacturers too) did that aren't necessarily the best way of doing things... like PCV system? lol...

TRex 01-14-2011 05:57 PM

^haha true...pcv system is a good idea...just needs to be better designed

straightner below
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7913/sam0584f.jpg

kmac 01-14-2011 06:00 PM

That screen would only really help during low load conditions and our factory maf is different as far as how it gets its air sample. Instead of having the hot needle exposed at the top to take its sample,then after it passes over exits thru the bottom of the sample tube. The Denso meter enters thru the bottom thru a sample tube it travels up the sample tube over the hot needle then hack out. With that sample tube design on the factory one if the air flow straigtener wasn't used it would not read correctly due to the orientation of the sample tube of like a venturi effect. Since the got needle is exposed on most of the other ones an elaborate straigtener is not needed. As far as gm goes I don't think fury even operate on a hot needle system they work on cold wire principle so the whole sensor is exposed and it operates of frequency I believe so I don't think much more would be needed for that to read correctly. Hope that helps.

hnda etr 01-14-2011 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmac (Post 689209)
That screen would only really help during low load conditions and our factory maf is different as far as how it gets its air sample. Instead of having the hot needle exposed at the top to take its sample,then after it passes over exits thru the bottom of the sample tube. The Denso meter enters thru the bottom thru a sample tube it travels up the sample tube over the hot needle then hack out. With that sample tube design on the factory one if the air flow straigtener wasn't used it would not read correctly due to the orientation of the sample tube of like a venturi effect. Since the got needle is exposed on most of the other ones an elaborate straigtener is not needed. As far as gm goes I don't think fury even operate on a hot needle system they work on cold wire principle so the whole sensor is exposed and it operates of frequency I believe so I don't think much more would be needed for that to read correctly. Hope that helps.

WAT? lol... thanks kevin!

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRex (Post 689205)
^haha true...pcv system is a good idea...just needs to be better designed

straightner below
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7913/sam0584f.jpg

thanks for the pic! I never noticed the straightener before... soon as I took my stock airbox off, it went into the storage shed never to be seen again lol...

rodrigo 01-14-2011 06:29 PM

anyone u chicken wire for the exhaust?? to make sure it goes out str8

kmac 01-14-2011 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lenny127 (Post 689255)
anyone u chicken wire for the exhaust?? to make sure it goes out str8

I put it in my under pants to filter out the lumps in my farts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hnda etr (Post 689239)
WAT? lol... thanks kevin!



thanks for the pic! I never noticed the straightener before... soon as I took my stock airbox off, it went into the storage shed never to be seen again lol...

lol, I know. Sorry it wasn't shorter.

Frequentflyer 01-15-2011 08:10 PM

I was one of the suckers who decided to try PTP's placebo mesh. I had it in for a while and then took it out, put it back in, took it out. I never felt much of a difference in the way the car ran. Finally, a few weeks ago, I decided to check out my g/s mass air flow with it in and then out using the AP. On average, I peaked about 5-6 g/s more with the mesh removed with relatively close intake temperatures, so from my testing, the mesh is a restriction more than anything. Needless to say, I took it back out, for good.

bnoon 01-18-2011 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frequentflyer (Post 690479)
I was one of the suckers who decided to try PTP's placebo mesh. I had it in for a while and then took it out, put it back in, took it out. I never felt much of a difference in the way the car ran. Finally, a few weeks ago, I decided to check out my g/s mass air flow with it in and then out using the AP. On average, I peaked about 5-6 g/s more with the mesh removed with relatively close intake temperatures, so from my testing, the mesh is a restriction more than anything. Needless to say, I took it back out, for good.

With your Cobb SRI, you wouldn't notice anything because the Cobb intake already has air straighteners built in. If you have another brand of SRI or CAI without them, you can see an improvement in stability of the MAF voltage at idle and low RPM with the mesh. Without some sort of straightening going on, the air near the "wall" of the MAF will not move as well as the air in the center of the MAF, which can throw sampling rates off.

labikesrcool 01-28-2011 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lenny127 (Post 689255)
anyone u chicken wire for the exhaust?? to make sure it goes out str8

actually i put my chicken wire on a swivel right at the exhaust outlet and then tied that to my steering wheel. now i can drift like tanner foust. woot!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
vB.Sponsors

©Copyright 2008 ; 2019 Cymru Internet Services LLC | FYHN™ Autosports HQ
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger

Page generated in 0.19160 seconds with 11 queries